What assumption do readers make about the accuracy of a written work?

Readers typically assume that a written work has not been disseminated before unless explicitly stated otherwise. This assumption is grounded in the expectation of originality and the publishing norms prevalent in academic and research contexts. When readers engage with a manuscript or article, they often interpret it as presenting new findings, insights, or theoretical advancements that have not been shared previously. If a piece has been disseminated before, it is customary for authors to acknowledge this to maintain transparency and uphold ethical standards in research. This assumption underlines the importance of proper citation and the responsibility of authors to ensure clarity around the novelty of their findings.

Other choices reflect various aspects of the publication process or editor roles but do not encapsulate the primary assumption made by readers regarding the originality of a written work.